Features of persons who have committed virtual sexual offenses

Korchagin V. V.
Postgraduate¹

1 - V.P. Serbsky National Medical Research Centre for Psychiatry and Narcology, Moscow, Russian Federation

Korchagin Vitaly; e-mail: cor4agin.vitalik@yandex.ru.

None declared.

The study had no sponsorship.

In the scientific review, elibrary.ru and the MEDLINE electronic databases were studied to form concepts about persons committing sexual delicts through the Internet. More than 100 scientific publications were identified, about 70 articles containing duplicate information were excluded from analysis. The results of the most significant studies revealing the features of this category of persons are presented. The role of the Internet is highlighted as a unique environment that predisposes to the implementation of abnormal sexual urges.

Internet, sexual disorders, virtual crimes, paraphilia, abnormal sexual behavior

10.29234/2308-9113-2023-11-2-1-10

1. Ministerstvo vnutrennih del Rossijskoj Federacii. Sostoyaniye prestupnosti (arkhivnyye dannyye) [Ministry of the Interior of the Russian Federation. The state of crime (archival data). Available at: https://mvd.rf/dejatelnost/statistics (Accessed: 05.02.2023). (In Russ.).

2. Seto M.C. Internet Sex Offenders. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association, 2015. 361.

3. Ray J.v., Kimonis E.R., Seto M.C. Correlates and Moderators of Child Pornography Consumption in a Community Sample. Sexual Abuse: Journal of Research and Treatment 2014; 26(6): 523-545.

4. Riegel D.L. Effects on boy-attracted pedosexual males of viewing boy erotica. Arch Sex Behav. 2004; 33(4): 321-323.

5. Seigfried K.C., Lovely R.W., Rogers M. Self-Reported Online Child Pornography Behavior: A Psychological Analysis. International Journal of Cyber Criminology 2008; 2(1): 286-297.

6. Middleton D., et al. An investigation into the applicability of the Ward and Siegert Pathways Model of child sexual abuse with Internet offenders. Psychology Crime and Law 2006; 12(6): 589-603.

7. Cohen L.E., Felson M. Social Change and Crime Rate Trends: A Routine Activity Approach. Am Sociol Rev. 1979; 44(4): 588-608.

8. Suler J. The online disinhibition effect. Cyberpsychology and Behavior 2004; 7(3): 321-326.

9. Ferraro M.M., Casey E., McGrath M. Investigating child exploitation and pornography: the Internet, the law and forensic science. USA: Elsevier Academic Pres, 2005. 320.

10. Nagel E. van der. Fluids on Pictures on Screens: Pseudonymous Affect on Reddit’s TributeMe. Social Media and Society 2020; (6): 1.

11. Yee N., Bailenson J.N., Ducheneaut N. The proteus effect: Implications of transformed digital self-representation on online and offline behavior. Communic Res. 2009; 36(2): 285-312.

12. Jenkins P. Beyond tolerance: Child pornography on the Internet. New York: New York University Press, 2001. 260.

13. Cooper A., et al. Online Sexual Activity: An Examination of Potentially Problematic Behaviors. Sex Addict Compulsivity 2004; 11(3): 129-143.

14. Seto M.C., Lalumière M.L. What is so special about male adolescent sexual offending? A review and test of explanations through meta-analysis. Psychol Bull. 2010; 136(4): 526-575.

15. Ybarra M.L., Mitchell K.J. Exposure to internet pornography among children and adolescents: a national survey. Cyberpsychol Behav. 2005; 8(5): 473[486.

16. Malamuth N.M., et al. Using the confluence model of sexual aggression to predict men’s conflict with women: a 10-year follow-up study. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1995; 69(2): 353-369.

17. Vega V., Malamuth N.M. Predicting sexual aggression: the role of pornography in the context of general and specific risk factors. Aggress Behav. 2007; 33(2): 104-117.

18. Wolak J., et al. Online «predators» and their victims: myths, realities, and implications for prevention and treatment. Am Psychol. 2008; 63(2): 111-128.

19. Mitchell K.J., Finkelhor D., Wolak J. Risk factors for and impact of online sexual solicitation of youth. JAMA 2001; 285(23): 3011-3014.

20. Briggs P., Simon W.T., Simonsen S. An exploratory study of Internet-initiated sexual offenses and the chat room sex offender: has the Internet enabled a new typology of sex offender? Sex Abuse 2011; 23(1): 72-91.

21. Burgess A.W., Carretta C.M., Burgess A.G. Patterns of federal Internet offenders: a pilot study. J Forensic Nurs. 2012; 8(3): 112-121.

22. Sheldon K., Howitt D. Sexual fantasy in paedophile offenders: Can any model explain satisfactorily new findings from a study of Internet and contact sexual offenders? Legal Criminol Psychol. 2008; 13(1): 137-158.

23. Krueger R.B., Kaplan M.S., First M.B. Sexual and other axis I diagnoses of 60 males arrested for crimes against children involving the Internet. CNS Spectr. 2009; 14(11): 623-631.

24. Ward T., Hudson S.M. The Construction and Development of Theory in the Sexual Offending Area: A Metatheoretical Framework. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment 1998; 10(1): 47-63, doi: 10.1023/A:1022106731724