Awareness of the Population in the Tatarstan Republic on the Rabies Epidemiology and Prevention

Agliullina S. T.
MD, PhD, Assistant Professor, Chair for Epidemiology and Evidence-Based Medicine¹
ORCID 0000-0003-4733-6911

Khasanova G. R.
Doctor of Medicine, Professor, Head, Chair for Epidemiology and Evidence-Based Medicine¹
ORCID 0000-0002-1733-2576

Yakubalieva R. R.
Resident, Chair for Epidemiology and Evidence-Based Medicine¹

Fazulzyanova I. M.
MD, PhD, Chair for Epidemiology and Disinfection²
ORCID 0000-0001-6559-8857

1 - Kazan State Medical University, Kazan, Russia
2 - Kazan State Medical Academy, Kazan, Russia

Agliullina Saida; e-mail: saida.agliullina@kazangmu.ru.

None declared.

The study had no sponsorship.

The level of population awareness and alertness in the prevention of rabies, as well as the organization of anti-rabies prevention for the population, is an important factor that plays a role in the development of the epidemic process of this disease. Therefore, we conducted a study to assess the awareness of the population in the Tatarstan Republic on the rabies epidemiology and prevention. Materials and methods. An anonymous online survey of the population permanently residing in the Tatarstan Republic (n=105) was conducted. Categorical data is presented as percentages (%) and absolute values. Results. 32 men (30.5%) and 73 women (69.5%) took part in the survey. The age of the respondents was 18-66 years, the median age was 26 years [Q1-Q3=23-30 years]. 88.6% of respondents live in the city (93/105), 11.4% (12/105) – in the rural area. 91.4% of respondents (96/105) believe that rabies can be infected through bites, scratches, and salivation by animals; only 59.0% (62/105) know that infection can occur when animal saliva gets on wounds. Only 66.7% of respondents (70/105) know about the existence of an anti-rabies vaccine. 60.0% (63/105) of respondents have pets, but among them only two thirds (65.1%, 41/63) have vaccinated their pets against rabies. A third of the respondents (35.2%, 37/105) experienced contact with an animal (bite or salvation of a wound). Among those who had contact with animals, more than half (54.1%, 20/37) did not seek medical help after the injury. Among the respondents who did not apply to a medical organization for help after the injury (n=20), only 45.0% of people suffered from vaccinated animals. 10.0% of respondents suffered from unvaccinated animals. In other cases, the vaccination status of the animal was unknown (45.0%). Conclusion. The study demonstrated an insufficient awareness in the rabies prevention and a low rate of seeking medical help in population after injury received from animals.

rabies, awareness, epidemiology, prevention

10.29234/2308-9113-2023-11-3-66-75

1. Nikiforov V.V., Avdeeva M.G. Beshenstvo. Aktual'nye voprosy. [Rabies. Current issues.] Epidemiologiya i infektsionnye bolezni [Epidemiology and infectious diseases] 2017; 22(6): 295-305, doi: 10.18821/1560-9529-2017-22-6-295-305 (In Russ.)

2. SanPiN 3.3686-21 «Sanitarno-epidemiologicheskie trebovaniya po profilaktike infekcionnyh boleznej». [Sanitary and epidemiological requirements for the prevention of infectious diseases 3.3686-21.] Available at: https://docs.cntd.ru/document/573660140 (In Russ.)

3. Zero by 30: the global strategic plan to end human deaths from dog-mediated rabies by 2030. – World Health Organization (WHO), Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO) and World Organisation for Animal Health (OIE), 2018. Available at: https://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/handle/10665/328053/WHO-CDS-NTD-NZD-2019.04-eng.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y

4. Hampson K., Coudeville L., Lembo T., et al. Global Alliance for Rabies Control Partners for Rabies Prevention. Estimating the global burden of endemic canine rabies. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2015;9(4): e0003709, doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0003709

5. Gosudarstvennyj doklad «O sostoyanii sanitarno-epidemiologicheskogo blagopoluchiya naseleniya v Rossijskoj Federacii v 2022 godu» [State Report «On the state of sanitary and epidemiological welfare of the population in the Russian Federation in 2022».] Moscow: Federal'naya sluzhba po nadzoru v sfere zashchity prav potrebitelej i blagopoluchiya cheloveka. [Federal Service for Supervision of Consumer Rights Protection and Human Well-Being.] 2023. 368 p. (In Russ.)

6. Botvinkin A.D., Zarva I.D., Meltsоv I.V., et al. Vozvrashchenie beshenstva posle mnogoletnego mezhepizooticheskogo perioda (Amurskaya oblast', Rossiya). [Rabies re-emergence after long-term disease freedom (Amur Oblast, Russia).] Veterinariya segodnya [Veterinary Science Today] 2022;11(4):309-318, doi: 10.29326/2304-196X-2022-11-4-309-318 (In Russ.)

7. Poleshchuk E.M., Sidorov G.N., Savkina E.S. Epizootologo-epidemiologicheskaya harakteristika beshenstva v Rossii v 2019-2021 gg. [Epizootiological and Epidemiological Characteristics of Rabies in Russia in 2019-2021.] Problemy osobo opasnyh infekcij [Problems of Particularly Dangerous Infections] 2023; (2): 49-60, doi: 10.21055/0370-1069-2023-2-49-60 (In Russ.)

8. Gosudarstvennyj doklad «O sostoyanii sanitarno-epidemiologicheskogo blagopoluchiya naseleniya v Respublike Tatarstan v 2022 godu». [State Report «On the state of sanitary and epidemiological welfare of the population in the Tatarstan Republic in 2022».] 2023. 338 p. (In Russ).

9. Onishchenko G.G., Popova A.Yu., Ezhlova E.B., et al. Epidemiologicheskaya obstanovka i voprosy identifikacii virusa beshenstva sredi lyudej na territorii Rossijskoj Federacii v period 2002-2015 gg. [Epidemiological Situation on and Problems of Identification of Rabies Virus in Humans in the Territory of the Russian Federation During the Period of 2002–2015.] Problemy Osobo Opasnykh Infektsii [Problems of Particularly Dangerous Infections] 2017; (3): 27-32, doi: 10.21055/0370-1069-2017-3-27-32 (In Russ.)

10. Khismatullina N.A., Gulyukin A.M., Gulyukin M.I., et al. Dva sluchaya gidrofobii v Respublike Tatarstan: prizhiznennaya i postmortal'naya laboratornaya diagnostika. [Two cases of hydrophobia in the Republic of Tatarstan: in vivo and postmortem laboratory diagnosis.] Voprosy virusologii [Problems of Virology] 2015; 60(2): 18-24. (In Russ.)